Horrible sticky greasy batter . A tiny bit of fish in each . Felt sick after eating these . Will never buy again
not as good as the standard type fingers
Not worth the extra cost, to much coating , stick to standard type fish fingrs.
These are classed as 'chunky' but it's chunky coating, not chunky fish. It's such a thin layer of fish, a very thick coating, and air in between. They're only 56% fish whereas their normal size fish fingers are 58% and Tesco normal size fish fingers 64%. Considering Birds Eye are now using pollock which is a cheaper fish than cod it's shameful the price is so high for a second-rate fish finger.
I love these!
Review from Iglo
These are so tasty with plenty of fish and we have ours sandwich between two thick slices of fresh white bread from our local bakers with rocket and tartar sauce with a squeeze of lemon
Be aware of change to recipe
Be aware that the recipe as stated on the packet itself appears to have been changed to include egg powder and not just egg white. Other members of the family say they taste even better but the change means I cannot eat them anymore due to intolerance to whole egg.
Not as illustrated
Not as illustrated on the packaging - lacked fish and what there was was poor quality greyish, plus the batter was soggy - very disappointing, won't be buying again.
crusty crumb coating
Thin fish, thick crumb coating. It didn't seem like there is any more fish than in a normal sized fish finger. They are okay.
EVERY PICTURE TELLS THE STORY.
NICE, WHITE TASTY FISH. WORTH EVERY PENNY. GOOD SIZE, ABOUT FIVE INCHES LONG AND FAT, NOT SKINNY. 3 EACH PER ADULT.
Too much batter
Looked hopeful but FAR too much batter. Tasted greasy. Didn't really feel like lots of extra fish. Think I'll just stick to normal fish fingers.
These have got to be the worst fish fingers i have ever tried. Grey fish strong taste Went in the bin